For Bk students (Brahmakumar & kumaris)

Recognise the permanent chariot of the Supreme Father Shiva with the proofs of murlis and avyakt vanis


When was this Rudra gyaan yagya established? How was it established? Who became the instruments? How was the family formed? Then, how did it disintegrate? How was it managed? Know the true meaning of all the concepts from the beginning till the end with the great sentences of the murlis and avyakt vanis.

Who is the actual founder of the yagya?

It is believed that Dada Lekhraj had visions, this is why the Raajasva Ashvamedh Avinaashi Rudra Gita Gyaan Yagya was established in Sindh Hyderabad in 1936-37. But if you observe, the foundation of the seed of knowledge was laid in 1936-37 in Calcutta, Bengal when the Light of Sadaa Shiva entered the partner (the permanent chariot) to narrate the meaning of Dada Lekhraj Kripalani’s visions.
The identification of the permanent chariot of the Father Shiva

 

Now, the diamond like Elevated Confluence Age (Purushottam Sangamyug) is going on. This itself is the most special confluence period of the drama of 5000 years which is the time of the end of the old kalpa as well as the beginning of the new kalpa. The confluence period of the other ages hasn’t been said to be special; they are ordinary confluences and this is the special Confluence Age equal to a diamond. It is because at this very time, the Light of Sadaa Shiva, who is always a resident of the Supreme Abode, comes to this world and only after taking the support of a corporeal body, He brings back the new kalpa.

 

Return of father Ram in the yagya
Ram’s soul comes again in the yagya of knowledge in the Paladi centre of Ahamdabad (Ahmedabad) itself. His physical body has an alaukik birth in Ahamdabad. Therefore, Bapdada has named Ahamdabad ‘the town of God (Allah ki nagari)’. It is because of this unlimited pride of God, this town was named ‘Aham (ego) + da (to give) + bad (later on)’, meaning Ahamdabad who has given up his (saatvik) ego after making everyone bow. Except this Ahamdabad Prabhu Park, Paladi service centre, all the other centres were made by the children, but just the Ahamdabad Paladi service centre is made by Brahma Baba with the help of the wealth of the yagya.

For spiritual study


Brahmakumaris, reply or we will! (At service *the Advance Party)

The Supreme Soul isn’t omnipresent, then where is the one in whom He is present?

The Supreme Soul isn’t omnipresent; He is present only in one Mahadev Shankar.

Shiva and Shankar are separate, then how did they become one? Please give reasons.

The Point of Light, Incorporeal Shiva entered corporeal Mahadev Shankar, so Shiva [and] Shankar became one.

A soul (atma) and the Supreme Soul (Paramatma) aren’t one and the same, then for whom it is praised, atma so Paramatma?

The Point of Light, Incorporeal Shiva entered corporeal Mahadev Shankar, so Shiva [and] Shankar became one.

Krishna isn’t God of the Gita in the corporeal form, then how is Shiva God in the corporeal form?


Krishna alias Brahma isn’t God of the Gita in the corporeal form. The Incorporeal Point of Light Shiva enters Shankar Mahadev and becomes God of the Gita in the corporeal form. (Proved from the Gita Chapters 10-3, 11-32, etc.)

The Ganges isn’t the purifier of the impure, then why is she seated on Shankar’s head?


Only after forming a relationship in a corporeal form with Shiva Shankar, Ganga sits on Shankar’s head.
(“… if not connected with the ocean, a river also becomes a drain.” Avyakt vani: 16.1.79, Pg. 4)

When more than 108 commentaries on the Gita have been produced by different sects, why can’t the Gita be explained according to the knowledge of the Brahmakumaris?


Just as more than 108 commentaries have been made on the Gita by various sects, similarly, the Gita has been accurately explained according to the murlis of Brahma Baba.

If the scriptures were false, why did Brahma Baba repeat the saying of the writers of scriptures again and again, ‘even if Brahma comes down to the Earth, we won’t leave the scriptures’?


If the essence of the Vedas [and] scriptures is compared with the great verses of Brahma incarnate, even the writers of scriptures will leave their obstinacy.

If Shankar and Vishnu weren’t present in the corporeal form, from where did so many temples and idols of both of them emerge? Why isn’t Brahma, the first personality of Trimurti Shiva worshipped? Why aren’t his temples and idols built?


Followers of Shankar and Vishnu incarnate, after recognizing them, never defamed them through their life in practice; hence there are so many memorials, temples and idols of them, whereas Brahma is neither remembered, nor are there his temples and idols.
MORE LINKS- Hindi
MORE LINKS- English
INFORMATION
STUDENT FORM

Copyright © 2025 by AIVV All rights reserved.